Someone wrote in [personal profile] mjg59,
That is an interesting interpretation. So then it depends on the intent of the distribution whether or not full installation information has to be provided? So as long as you redistribute Fedora and don't have ties to any hardware company you can use fedora as is, but otherwise you cannot?

Or is the backdoor simply to split the conveying in two transactions, one for the software and one for the hardware?

Isn't that a giant bug/loophole in GPLv3 then? Time for a patch :)


(Read 346 comments)

Post a comment in response:

From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.