Re: Why not just use coreboot?

Date: 2012-06-16 04:11 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
If that's the case then the chip must have restricted write access, which doesn't surprise me. Couldn't you then at least extract the ROM and flash it to a different chip? A chip that doesn't have Secure Boot enabled? Perhaps even try to reverse engineer the firmware directly and strip out the secure boot code? DRM such as SecuROM (much often used in video games) uses SSL and many other forms of cryptography, the same types you have mentioned before. People modify the .exe files at assembly level to remove the DRM from the executable. Perhaps the same thing could potentially be done for Secure Boot? Reverse-engineering such code is not an easy task at all however some (Coreboot) developers can make sense out of some of the compiled assembly instructions from the BIOS.

Obviously not everybody would be soldering their boards left and right to replace the chips but perhaps some progress? At least the deep inter-workings of Secure Boot would be figured out (if this could be done.)
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Nebula. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags