Re: Red herring?

Date: 2013-02-05 12:36 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] mjg59
Is this an attempt to justify the fact that you have been working to make secure boot workable for Linux? Or is it an attempt to criticise some developers you don't like who are working for Google?

No? It's an attempt to dissuade people from blindly recommending Chromebooks as an alternative to Microsoft's imposed Secure Boot setup.

Tell me one thing: in your history of using Linux, how many cases have you come across of a compromised kernel being used to boot a box?

More than once. The use of kernel modules as persistent rootkits is hardly uncommon.

Why are people suddenly all barking about secure boot? Has there been some massive security incident that nobody on earth knows about - except Microsoft and Google?

Secure Boot would be impractical to implement on BIOS systems, so the timing's largely down to the availability of alternative firmware implementations for x86. Embedded devices have implemented equivalent technology for years.
From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Nebula. Member of the Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags