Date: 2016-05-20 09:43 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I agree that merging all commits into a single ones does more harm than good. Personally, what I like to do before publishing any commit history is to interactively rebase it to squash together things such as trivial corrections to commits, essentially to avoid noise. A good example of that is a commit that tries to implement something, then a commit that does something else, and finally a commit the adds something that I forgot in the first one: that third one I would squash into the first one.
Identity URL: 
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Google. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags