Re: Another misuse of monopoly

Date: 2011-09-26 04:10 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I don't think they're trying to "hide" at all. They're using UEFI. You people had years to either influence the direction of UEFI or request some changes. But what did you do? Nothing? Even when Google implemented for Chromebooks you did nothing. Only when MS decided to implement this standard do you take issue with it and then pull out all the tired old arguments about monopoly and big bad MS. This is the same company that most of you claim is irrelevant daily. But now suddenly they're their late 90's invincible force.

Your complaint here is with the UEFI standard first, and OEMs second. MS can't speak for what OEMs will do. But I imagine most will offer a "disable secure boot" option. And if the blog author knows of OEMs who won't, why doesn't he list their names?

From:
Anonymous
OpenID
Identity URL: 
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org


 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Nebula. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags