I guess I'm asking the same question as everyone else: is there any good reason for UEFI to be bigger than Linux, and is it possible to explain that reason succinctly?
Of course, supplementary questions abound, like: if UEFI is less mature and more cumbersome than Linux, why not just use Linux as a boot loader?
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at nvidia. Ex-biologist. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon and Bluesky.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-01-23 10:52 pm (UTC)Of course, supplementary questions abound, like: if UEFI is less mature and more cumbersome than Linux, why not just use Linux as a boot loader?