Someone wrote in [personal profile] mjg59 2012-01-31 01:07 pm (UTC)

Those particular paragraphs make it explicitly clear that the companies in question want to avoid enforcement by the SFC, who would otherwise "force them to comply with the licenses of software they ship". Thus, they want to rewrite Busybox not just to avoid the Busybox license (which seems perfectly acceptable, apart from contributing to the further proliferation of proprietary software), but to allow continued violation of other licenses without fear of enforcement.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org