What concerned me is that there were damages being collected and no visibility regarding whether they were going into people's pockets - meaning that a few people might be profiteering on the other Busybox developers - or otherwise. I have just two weeks ago found that Andersen donated all his share of the money, which is fine, and now I see the SFC's tax forms online, which corroborate what I've been told. And I have been told a good deal since you're no longer SFLC's client. They don't miss you, either.
I have consulted for a number of the Busybox infringers, helping them to come into compliance. I have seen them, and their technology providers, contribute significant software, including a good many kernel drivers that would not otherwise be in the public. I submit that if you think there's no code coming out of GPL enforcement, you're just not looking hard enough.
Bzzzzt!
What concerned me is that there were damages being collected and no visibility regarding whether they were going into people's pockets - meaning that a few people might be profiteering on the other Busybox developers - or otherwise. I have just two weeks ago found that Andersen donated all his share of the money, which is fine, and now I see the SFC's tax forms online, which corroborate what I've been told. And I have been told a good deal since you're no longer SFLC's client. They don't miss you, either.
I have consulted for a number of the Busybox infringers, helping them to come into compliance. I have seen them, and their technology providers, contribute significant software, including a good many kernel drivers that would not otherwise be in the public. I submit that if you think there's no code coming out of GPL enforcement, you're just not looking hard enough.