You're wrong

Date: 2012-02-03 08:26 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Thinking of licenses in terms of threats of lawsuits is exactly right.

The purpose of legal counsel before the fact is to be professionally risk averse, and so the only measure of success or failure is gong to be in terms of ability to mitigate risk.

Personally, if I were in Sony's position, I'd do exactly the same thing, especially if my parts supplier were Qualcomm and I was contractually obligated to not reveal the contents of the hypervisor on the Snapdragon ARM processor I used (and in fact could not, because only Qualcomm had it in the first place), or if my supplier were nVidia, and I couldn't reveal the signing keys needed to allow you to comply with the ability to run your own kernel because, frankly, again, only nVidia has them.

Both of these derive from governmental obligations these companies face when these chips are used in mobile phones, and unless those go away, you have a chain of risk that leads to needing to rewrite to get out from under the GPL.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at nvidia. Ex-biologist. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon and Bluesky.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags