From: (Anonymous)
Please, tell me what I am missing:

Microsoft will sing code for anyone. This cannot ever be secure. First, I don't buy the argument that they can track who signed it. There will be a market of signed loaders, with the person whose code was submitted either non-existing or not knowing anything about it.
So, Microsoft will blacklist them: when? When there is a known exploit? It seems a little late for a cryptographically "safe" feature. No one else has the list of keys that were signed. Maybe they will blacklist everything they sign except own - there are two problems with that. Space overflow in blacklists will limit the count of keys they can sign. Second: this would mean that the Fedora shim loader would be useless.

My point is that the signing service will either be insecure - also for Fedora - or will be limited or will be terminated. I now value what you just described for making own keys, otherwise the whole feature is pretty useless.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. [personal profile] mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags