So you believe that making whatever claims is always OK as long as you're "trying to achieve something constructive"? The ends justify the means? I do not agree with that.

And even if you think Ted's posts did not have a constructive effect, how would that justify writing libel about him being a "rape apologist"? Matthew Garrett's post here has not been helpful or constructive. Does that now justify writing articles like "Matthew Garrett is a known pedophile"?