So you believe that making whatever claims is always OK as long as you're "trying to achieve something constructive"? The ends justify the means? I do not agree with that.
And even if you think Ted's posts did not have a constructive effect, how would that justify writing libel about him being a "rape apologist"? Matthew Garrett's post here has not been helpful or constructive. Does that now justify writing articles like "Matthew Garrett is a known pedophile"?
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Worst piece of libel on Planet Gnome ever
Date: 2012-10-30 04:44 pm (UTC)And even if you think Ted's posts did not have a constructive effect, how would that justify writing libel about him being a "rape apologist"? Matthew Garrett's post here has not been helpful or constructive. Does that now justify writing articles like "Matthew Garrett is a known pedophile"?