I now have the fear that "the ones you spoke to" are not representative of "women in floss" but may be vocal extremists. Is there a more substantial open way to formalize what "women in floss" really feels in general than through the ones you spoke to? We have a problem like this in french newspaper, some vocal Islam extremists do not like representation of their prophet and call to censure but the whole majority is fine with caricatures and a good ( or even bad) joke. We don't hear the latter so much than the bomb threats.
I still do not see sex allusions as a grave offense resented by a majority of "women in FLOSS" I hope not being wrong and would like some evidences for once.
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: What is offending - uncorrect?
Date: 2012-11-13 10:12 pm (UTC)I still do not see sex allusions as a grave offense resented by a majority of "women in FLOSS"
I hope not being wrong and would like some evidences for once.