Everything here applies to this as well. Thanks, VMware. In Microsoft's case it turned out that nothing was using that value and it could be replaced without breaking things. With luck that's true here as well.
I now have the fear that "the ones you spoke to" are not representative of "women in floss" but may be vocal extremists. Is there a more substantial open way to formalize what "women in floss" really feels in general than through the ones you spoke to? We have a problem like this in french newspaper, some vocal Islam extremists do not like representation of their prophet and call to censure but the whole majority is fine with caricatures and a good ( or even bad) joke. We don't hear the latter so much than the bomb threats.
I still do not see sex allusions as a grave offense resented by a majority of "women in FLOSS" I hope not being wrong and would like some evidences for once.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: What is offending - uncorrect?
(Anonymous) 2012-11-13 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)I still do not see sex allusions as a grave offense resented by a majority of "women in FLOSS"
I hope not being wrong and would like some evidences for once.