Yeah, the copyright holder does tend to have a broader range of options, and it would be interesting to see if there's any way to construct a license such that that's not an option. The absence of any consideration on the part of the recipient makes it difficult for a license to simply assert that the copyright holder will never relicense code, so we'd probably need some kind of third party.
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: I think it is a better model than Android
Date: 2013-06-20 12:27 am (UTC)