> yes, because GNOME can be "switched" to Qt, and Red Hat can do that.
Obviously you have not read the source code of any GNOME application.
>> I'm not sure that Gnome is basically a 100% Red Hat project. I think not.
> yeah, don't think so too. otherwise I might have missed a memo.
Were are you two be living the last 15 years? Under a rock? GNOME is *not* a Red Hat project. It was started by Miguel de Icaza as the business of his startup Ximian. When that business went bust, the whole package was given to the care of the GNOME Foundation.
Has Red Hat invested a large sum of money and human resources into it in the last ten years? Yes. But they do not own the project. Did I mention the GNOME Foundation?
I'm interested in psychedelics research, care to recommend your preferences?
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Re: Qt
Date: 2014-01-20 10:12 pm (UTC)> yes, because GNOME can be "switched" to Qt, and Red Hat can do that.
Obviously you have not read the source code of any GNOME application.
>> I'm not sure that Gnome is basically a 100% Red Hat project. I think not.
> yeah, don't think so too. otherwise I might have missed a memo.
Were are you two be living the last 15 years? Under a rock? GNOME is *not* a Red Hat project. It was started by Miguel de Icaza as the business of his startup Ximian. When that business went bust, the whole package was given to the care of the GNOME Foundation.
Has Red Hat invested a large sum of money and human resources into it in the last ten years? Yes. But they do not own the project. Did I mention the GNOME Foundation?
I'm interested in psychedelics research, care to recommend your preferences?