Matthew Garrett ([personal profile] mjg59) wrote 2014-09-17 08:59 am (UTC)

Re: ACPI spec

Everything's safe when we have a reference implementation that people test against in a useful timeframe, and Linux is not currently that implementation. We churn far too quickly.

ACPI is formally specified, but there's no meaningful way you can write a specification that documents every single possible implicit assumption in an implementation. You could potentially write a Linux-based test suite, but we'd still need someone to run that on every single piece of ACPI-based ARM hardware (including the unreleased ones) towards the end of every kernel cycle.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org