Matthew Garrett ([personal profile] mjg59) wrote2014-10-02 09:20 am
Entry tags:

Actions have consequences (or: why I'm not fixing Intel's bugs any more)

Edit: About two months after this was written, Intel committed to a large scale diversity initiative. Actions speak louder than words, and this was an effective repudiation of the behaviour described below. I've happily worked on Intel-related issues since then.

A lot of the kernel work I've ended up doing has involved dealing with bugs on Intel-based systems - figuring out interactions between their hardware and firmware, reverse engineering features that they refuse to document, improving their power management support, handling platform integration stuff for their GPUs and so on. Some of this I've been paid for, but a bunch has been unpaid work in my spare time[1].

Recently, as part of the anti-women #GamerGate campaign[2], a set of awful humans convinced Intel to terminate an advertising campaign because the site hosting the campaign had dared to suggest that the sexism present throughout the gaming industry might be a problem. Despite being awful humans, it is absolutely their right to request that a company choose to spend its money in a different way. And despite it being a dreadful decision, Intel is obviously entitled to spend their money as they wish. But I'm also free to spend my unpaid spare time as I wish, and I no longer wish to spend it doing unpaid work to enable an abhorrently-behaving company to sell more hardware. I won't be working on any Intel-specific bugs. I won't be reverse engineering any Intel-based features[3]. If the backlight on your laptop with an Intel GPU doesn't work, the number of fucks I'll be giving will fail to register on even the most sensitive measuring device.

On the plus side, this is probably going to significantly reduce my gin consumption.

[1] In the spirit of full disclosure: in some cases this has resulted in me being sent laptops in order to figure stuff out, and I was not always asked to return those laptops. My current laptop was purchased by me.

[2] I appreciate that there are some people involved in this campaign who earnestly believe that they are working to improve the state of professional ethics in games media. That is a worthy goal! But you're allying yourself to a cause that disproportionately attacks women while ignoring almost every other conflict of interest in the industry. If this is what you care about, find a new way to do it - and perhaps deal with the rather more obvious cases involving giant corporations, rather than obsessing over indie developers.

For avoidance of doubt, any comments arguing this point will be replaced with the phrase "Fart fart fart".

[3] Except for the purposes of finding entertaining security bugs
badgerbag: (Default)

[personal profile] badgerbag 2014-10-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
mjg you're awesome! I wonder if anyone at Intel will talk with you about this.

I also wonder if whoever made the decision about pulling the ads realizes they've been played.... Seems likely by now.

This Author is Wack

[personal profile] ahhh_okay 2014-10-02 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
He seems to be screening comments because he hates being wrong. A really terrible personality trait, and one which is absolutely not needed in free software.

Re: So, what,

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Why? Here's why:

There's this Emma Watson thing. There's a site, saying they're going to release private nude images. It's attributed to 4chan. then it's attributed to a marketing firm. And then there are no pictures, it was a stunt. Then even the marketing firm is someone's sick, for-profit joke.

GamerGate began as a series of internet detectives swarming around they alleged personal life of someone who they'd never heard of. I've heard it started on 4chan. I've heard it's a joke by 4chan. I have no idea. You have no idea. But the OP says: I believe that, even if you don't think it's not someone's disgusting prank, there's no reason to associate with it, much less defend it.

I mentioned something about politeness in response to another comment. The same applies here. People who leap to do exactly what the OP has said he's not interested in is being disrespectful, has an agenda or didn't read the bloody post.

You can turn away door to door salesmen, you can take flyers off your car and you can absolutely not listen to people from the internet who won't listen to you. It's a free country. Or internet. Whatever.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
>getting pissed off over ads
Kill me please. Anything that puts less ads on the net is a good thing.
Also make your site work without javascript what is wrong with you

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
See http://wondermark.com/1k62/ for how this comes across. It's not like you're going to convince anyone to change their personal ethics through any amount of ranting at them about your beliefs.

Thank you.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Sad to see that this so-called #Gamergate has gotten traction even among the Linux community, by the looks of r/linux. Bad apples in every bunch, I suppose.

Before I hide from all this new fallout, ironically enough, by burying myself in Super Smash Bros. 3DS for the next week; thanks for standing up for this issue. It may not make Intel blink, but it greatly reaffirms my hope that people sincerely care about the sexism problem in tech.

As a man with laptops which have Intel GPUs, thanks.

How dare you

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I cannot believe you are so obviously willing to suppress dissent and attack free speech, you monster.

I was _going_ to leave the comment "Fart fart fart", but now I can't do so because I'd be associated with a bunch of misogynist trolls.

Even worse, it's apparent you'd actually screen my comment anyway. What kind of person would screen "Fart fart fart"? I ask you.

Well good riddance!

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
FOSS needs less extremist gender/political social-justice warriors like yourself in key coding positions.

The actual GamaSutra article that caused the whole kerfuffle

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi,
this is the article that caused the whole "boycott Gamasutra" thang:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/224400/Gamers_dont_have_to_be_your_audience_Gamers_are_over.php

A quote from the article:
"These obtuse shitslingers, these wailing hyper-consumers, these childish internet-arguers -- they are not my audience."

Are you honestly surprised?

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
Controversy has been detected, evidence has been sought, and a conclusive understanding has been reached. The world is -not- flat, climate change caused by humans -is- happening, and the hostility and bile directed at women by a significant subset of the GamerGate crowd is real and continues to occur.

There is nothing new that you, or anyone else, could contribute that would alter that conclusion. Thus, the topic is closed.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, I'm glad. If your post and actions to the comments section are representative of your normal behavior, you're doing the open source community a favor by quitting.

Great, now we've lost another good Linux developer.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Gamers are just fucking scum.

Page 6 of 14