Dustin's blog post starts with "I am speaking for my employer, Canonical". So when you say that Canonical refuses to answer questions, I think you are wrong regarding, at least, containers. Canonical, through the voice of Dustin, explicitly said that building Ubuntu-based container is not a copyright violation.
But I think your concerns remain valid for other things (custom ISO for example).
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2015-08-18 10:00 pm (UTC)So when you say that Canonical refuses to answer questions, I think you are wrong regarding, at least, containers.
Canonical, through the voice of Dustin, explicitly said that building Ubuntu-based container is not a copyright violation.
But I think your concerns remain valid for other things (custom ISO for example).