Date: 2016-01-21 09:31 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I have nothing but questions over this.

  • Are you suggesting the Linux Foundation doesn't want Sandler on their board, because of some circumstantial lawsuit over licensing violations?

  • If the above is true, are you saying the Foundation is changing their bylaws to prevent a singular person from potentially entering the board?

  • Are you suggesting this person is a threat to the Foundation somehow?

  • Are you saying the Linux Foundation has no board members in favour of GPL enforcement? If so, would one or even two community-elected board members have significant power over the Foundation's roadmap and actions? I can see no significant action in the bylaws that requires anything less than a majority.

  • Are you writing about the same Karen Sandler who eliminated the cash reserves of the GNOME foundation?


    • What are you really writing this for?
    If you don't have an account you can create one now.
    HTML doesn't work in the subject.
    More info about formatting

    If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

     
    Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
    Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

    Profile

    Matthew Garrett

    About Matthew

    Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. [personal profile] mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.

    Expand Cut Tags

    No cut tags