From: (Anonymous)
Sure, however I think you are perfectly capable of understanding that this was not meant to discuss Google. Somehow I seriously doubt you would remain silent about a company that produces F/OSS by exploiting minorities for example. Everything one does has consequences. The excessive pays and benefits in ad-tech combined with the omerta (legal or not) to talk about the consequences can make even the most hardcore F/OSS idealist disillusioned to keep on going.

Nota bene; I don’t know how this handled in the US, but here in Europe business models like Uber, Deliveroo, etc that are based on the labor of self-employed contractors are being highly scrutinized by both labor unions and government. These non-employees are often exploited and discarded at will. As someone like yourself, who is in favor of more employee rights, I find it truly strange that you promote a company whose business model is essentially the same for the future of F/OSS.
Identity URL: 
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Google. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags