Date: 2023-10-13 09:19 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)

When I clicked on the links on the descriptions of his misbehaviour, I was a bit shocked that they only point to individual claims by other people. Although that still might be a good clue if the claims are uttered independently (which outsiders cannot assess), that's a bit weak for describing them as facts in a professional context (vs. "he allegedly acted poorly towards his own staff").

To me, this blog post isn't very convincing in its intended message. It makes me rather worry whether the FSF is a place where you'd have to worry that a collective deciding to get you out of your position would lead to very bad allegations against you being treated as facts.

Because from what the blog post is presenting, the situation could be both. As an outsider, this blog post does not allow me to assess which one it is, nor to take sides with anyone here.

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. [personal profile] mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags