For those who haven't followed mjg59's link (and if you're in that group, you may want to skip this comment entirely), his core premise, wrapped up in a lot of noise and fury, is that if we were all Real Men, we would use physical violence to ensure that women were subservient. He then goes on to suggest that the reason we don't do this is that all western men are cowards.
However, he's using Tor to hide his details from us - he is sufficiently cowardly that he would prefer to put Tor server operators at risk of a chat with the local police (hopefully nothing too scary) than risk us, his audience, learning a tiny bit about him.
Says a lot, really - the women in this discussion are happy to be identified with (at least) a pseudonym, and don't try to hide. The sexist idiot? Doesn't even have the courage to risk Matthew knowing his IP address, let alone a pseudonym. I wonder what he's so scared of...
no subject
For those who haven't followed mjg59's link (and if you're in that group, you may want to skip this comment entirely), his core premise, wrapped up in a lot of noise and fury, is that if we were all Real Men, we would use physical violence to ensure that women were subservient. He then goes on to suggest that the reason we don't do this is that all western men are cowards.
However, he's using Tor to hide his details from us - he is sufficiently cowardly that he would prefer to put Tor server operators at risk of a chat with the local police (hopefully nothing too scary) than risk us, his audience, learning a tiny bit about him.
Says a lot, really - the women in this discussion are happy to be identified with (at least) a pseudonym, and don't try to hide. The sexist idiot? Doesn't even have the courage to risk Matthew knowing his IP address, let alone a pseudonym. I wonder what he's so scared of...