Hi, I share your skepticism about poorly implemented encryption mechanisms being marketed as 'secure'. But I do lack the technical capabilities to assess implementations. The Matrix-protocol says it has solved the problem as well, and once the Oauth integration is complete, there is no more need to use a (central) identity-server. That looks to me like an even more secure system than Signal's - or am I wrong?
Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
What about Matrix?
Date: 2025-03-19 05:28 am (UTC)I share your skepticism about poorly implemented encryption mechanisms being marketed as 'secure'. But I do lack the technical capabilities to assess implementations. The Matrix-protocol says it has solved the problem as well, and once the Oauth integration is complete, there is no more need to use a (central) identity-server. That looks to me like an even more secure system than Signal's - or am I wrong?