Awesome post, thanks.

Date: 2012-01-05 05:00 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
I haven't spent tons of time with this stuff, but every time I have, I've been bewildered by why everything sucks so bad. I *thought* the whole point of DVI and HDMI was pixel-perfectness, and you get it with real monitors, but not with TVs. (And I also always wondered where 1366x768 came from, since it's not quite actually 16:9.) I've seen first-hand almost everything you're describing here. Being an anal-retentive neatnik this stuff *really* bugs me but I've somewhat accepted the fact that no matter what is set how, it really doesn't matter too much once you're across the room.

Also, I love 4:3 and hate 16:9 in the first place, but that's a whole other rant. (Short version: with a 4:3 screen, 4:3 content looks perfect, and anything else gets letterboxed to some extent. With a 16:9 screen, 16:9 content--the minority of what I watch--looks good (pixel accuracy notwithstanding) and everything else gets stretched, zoomed, distorted, cropped, letterboxed, or pillarboxed. Lovely. And on a computer, I want height, due to all the menu bars.)

Again, thanks for putting together a great post. Lots of good info in one spot--and a perfectly acceptable solution at the end. :-)
Identity URL: 
Account name:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.


If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at

Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.


Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Google. Ex-biologist. @mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer.

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags