[personal profile] mjg59
John Scalzi recently wrote a piece on straight white male privilege. If you haven't read it already, go and do so. No rush. I'll wait.

So. Some facts:
  • Women are underrepresented in free software development
  • Those women who are involved in free software development are overwhelmingly more likely to have been subject to sexual harassment, belittling commentary or just plain ignored because of their gender
  • When asked, women tend to believe that these two facts are fairly strongly related

(If you disagree with any of these then that's absolutely your right. You're wrong, but that's ok. But please do me a favour and stop reading here. Otherwise you'll just get angry and then you'll write something ill-tempered and still wrong in the comments and then I'll have to delete it and why not just save everybody the time and effort and go and eat ice cream or something instead)

I know I've said this before, but inappropriate and marginalising behaviour is rife in our community, and at all levels of our community. There's the time an open source evangelist just flat out told a woman that her experiences didn't match his so she must be an outlier. There's the time a leading kernel developer said that most rape statistics were basically made up. There's the time that I said the most useful thing Debian could do with its money would be to buy prostitutes for its developers, simultaneously sexualising the discussion, implying that Debian developers were all straight men and casting sex workers as property. These aren't the exceptions. It's endemic. Almost all of us have been part of the problem, and in doing so we've contributed to an environment that has at best driven away capable contributors. You probably don't want to know what it's done at worst.

But what people have done in the past isn't important. What's important is how we behave in the future. If you're not angry about social injustice like this then you're doing it wrong. If you're reading this then there's a pretty high probability that you're a white male. So, it's great that you're angry. You should be! As a straight white male born into a fairly well-off family, a native English speaker in an English speaking country, I have plenty of time to be angry before going back to my nice apartment and living my almost entirely discrimination-free life. So if it makes me angry, I have absolutely no way of comprehending how angry it must make the people who actually have to live with this shit on a daily basis.


(Were tampon mouse able to form and express coherent thoughts, tampon mouse would not put up with this shit)

The point isn't to be smugly self aware of our own shortcomings and the shortcomings of others. The point is to actually do something about it. If you're not already devoting some amount of your resources to improving fairness in the world, then why not? It doesn't have to be about women in technology - if you're already donating to charity or helping out at schools or engaging in local politics or any of the countless other ways an individual can help make the world a better place, large or small, then keep on doing that. But do consider that many of us have done things in the past that contributed to the alienation of an astounding number of potential community members, and if you can then please do do something to make up for it. It might be donating to groups like The Ada Initiative. It might be mentoring students for projects like the GNOME Outreach Program for Women, or working to create similar programs. Even just making our communities less toxic by pointing out unacceptable behaviour when you see it makes a huge difference.

But most importantly, be aware that it was people like me who were responsible for this problem in the first place and people like me who need to take responsibility for solving it. We can't demand the victims do that for us.

Date: 2012-05-22 11:19 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hmmm, maybe I missed something in Matthew's post, but I didn't read it as though he was singling anyone out (well, he admitted his own mistake, but I think that pointing out own mistakes can hardly be seen as vilifying others).

Or do you mean that he's "singling out" men? Face it, most sexism against women is originating from men. And in the FLOSS world most sexism is directed against women. In other parts of the world it might be different (there's a fair amount of sexism directed towards men too, but I've yet to see it happen in the FLOSS world).

Your line of thought of (and I paraphrase) "avoiding women at all costs because they're just trouble", is exactly the kind of mindwarped thinking that makes the sexism take root. The women not only have to suffer from the direct sexism, they also have to suffer indirect sexism when they're treated as trouble. Just like rape victims are being told that they're the ones to blame for dressing a certain way, etc.

"The gays wouldn't have been gaybashed if they hadn't been kissing in public", "The niggers wouldn't have been burned by the KKK if they'd just stayed in Africa where they belong", etc.

It's not the women that are trouble, it's not the women that you should avoid. It's the men who behave like shit against women that should be told off or kicked out.

I've heard it claimed so many times that "yeah, but the silent majority don't support the few sexist/racist/whatever bastards, we're not like them". But the problem is that the majority is silent. As long as you, I and all the others remain silent, as long as we don't defend the weak (and mind you, I'm not saying that women are weak, I'm saying that most minorities are), we are a part of the problem.

-- David Weinehall

Date: 2012-05-23 11:16 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Hi, I think I've quite possibly misunderstood Matthew's post, that I've found sort of confusing, but I think David and quite possibly Matthew, misunderstood my comment (well, my comment was screened so I think that was the one that David replied). Surely the first is because my poor English reading and the second because my poor English writing :-)

I want to make sure that my line of thought of is _NOT_ "avoiding women at all costs because they're just trouble". My line of thought of my position against any kind of sexist behaviour in the free software community is because I feel this is the right thing, and if I'm a man or a woman has nothing to do.

-- Juanjo "screened" Marin

Profile

Matthew Garrett

About Matthew

Power management, mobile and firmware developer on Linux. Security developer at Aurora. Ex-biologist. [personal profile] mjg59 on Twitter. Content here should not be interpreted as the opinion of my employer. Also on Mastodon.

Page Summary

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags