Matthew Garrett ([personal profile] mjg59) wrote2014-10-02 09:20 am
Entry tags:

Actions have consequences (or: why I'm not fixing Intel's bugs any more)

Edit: About two months after this was written, Intel committed to a large scale diversity initiative. Actions speak louder than words, and this was an effective repudiation of the behaviour described below. I've happily worked on Intel-related issues since then.

A lot of the kernel work I've ended up doing has involved dealing with bugs on Intel-based systems - figuring out interactions between their hardware and firmware, reverse engineering features that they refuse to document, improving their power management support, handling platform integration stuff for their GPUs and so on. Some of this I've been paid for, but a bunch has been unpaid work in my spare time[1].

Recently, as part of the anti-women #GamerGate campaign[2], a set of awful humans convinced Intel to terminate an advertising campaign because the site hosting the campaign had dared to suggest that the sexism present throughout the gaming industry might be a problem. Despite being awful humans, it is absolutely their right to request that a company choose to spend its money in a different way. And despite it being a dreadful decision, Intel is obviously entitled to spend their money as they wish. But I'm also free to spend my unpaid spare time as I wish, and I no longer wish to spend it doing unpaid work to enable an abhorrently-behaving company to sell more hardware. I won't be working on any Intel-specific bugs. I won't be reverse engineering any Intel-based features[3]. If the backlight on your laptop with an Intel GPU doesn't work, the number of fucks I'll be giving will fail to register on even the most sensitive measuring device.

On the plus side, this is probably going to significantly reduce my gin consumption.

[1] In the spirit of full disclosure: in some cases this has resulted in me being sent laptops in order to figure stuff out, and I was not always asked to return those laptops. My current laptop was purchased by me.

[2] I appreciate that there are some people involved in this campaign who earnestly believe that they are working to improve the state of professional ethics in games media. That is a worthy goal! But you're allying yourself to a cause that disproportionately attacks women while ignoring almost every other conflict of interest in the industry. If this is what you care about, find a new way to do it - and perhaps deal with the rather more obvious cases involving giant corporations, rather than obsessing over indie developers.

For avoidance of doubt, any comments arguing this point will be replaced with the phrase "Fart fart fart".

[3] Except for the purposes of finding entertaining security bugs
badgerbag: (Default)

[personal profile] badgerbag 2014-10-02 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
mjg you're awesome! I wonder if anyone at Intel will talk with you about this.

I also wonder if whoever made the decision about pulling the ads realizes they've been played.... Seems likely by now.
(screened comment)

(no subject)

[personal profile] phi - 2014-10-03 20:43 (UTC) - Expand
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)

This Author is Wack

[personal profile] ahhh_okay 2014-10-02 10:34 pm (UTC)(link)
He seems to be screening comments because he hates being wrong. A really terrible personality trait, and one which is absolutely not needed in free software.

Re: This Author is Wack

[personal profile] emanueleaina 2014-10-04 09:07 am (UTC)(link)
Since you give the impression that you don't even know who Matthew is and what has done, I'm not really sure you're the right person to decide who is needed and who's not.

Still, out of curiosity, does Free Software needs you?

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)
>getting pissed off over ads
Kill me please. Anything that puts less ads on the net is a good thing.
Also make your site work without javascript what is wrong with you
(screened comment)

Thank you.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Sad to see that this so-called #Gamergate has gotten traction even among the Linux community, by the looks of r/linux. Bad apples in every bunch, I suppose.

Before I hide from all this new fallout, ironically enough, by burying myself in Super Smash Bros. 3DS for the next week; thanks for standing up for this issue. It may not make Intel blink, but it greatly reaffirms my hope that people sincerely care about the sexism problem in tech.

As a man with laptops which have Intel GPUs, thanks.

How dare you

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:49 pm (UTC)(link)
I cannot believe you are so obviously willing to suppress dissent and attack free speech, you monster.

I was _going_ to leave the comment "Fart fart fart", but now I can't do so because I'd be associated with a bunch of misogynist trolls.

Even worse, it's apparent you'd actually screen my comment anyway. What kind of person would screen "Fart fart fart"? I ask you.
(screened comment)

Well good riddance!

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
FOSS needs less extremist gender/political social-justice warriors like yourself in key coding positions.

Re: Well good riddance!

(Anonymous) 2014-10-03 12:49 am (UTC)(link)
Ah yes. Because considering that women are people, that women have every bit as much right to create computer games as men, and that women have every bit as much right as men to *not get routine rape and death threats* whenever they do anything like, y'know, have an opinion -- that's a sign of an "extremist gender/political social-justice warrior".

Over here on Planet Sane it is a sign of a normal human being.

Re: Well good riddance!

(Anonymous) - 2014-10-03 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Well good riddance!

[personal profile] kaberett - 2014-10-03 17:49 (UTC) - Expand

The actual GamaSutra article that caused the whole kerfuffle

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi,
this is the article that caused the whole "boycott Gamasutra" thang:

http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/224400/Gamers_dont_have_to_be_your_audience_Gamers_are_over.php

A quote from the article:
"These obtuse shitslingers, these wailing hyper-consumers, these childish internet-arguers -- they are not my audience."

Re: The actual GamaSutra article that caused the whole kerfuffle

(Anonymous) 2014-10-03 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
If you thought she was talking about you, maybe you should stop doing those things. If you're not doing those things, why would you want to be associated with those kinds of people anyway? If you're not sure who she's talking about, play some rounds of whatever the newest Call of Duty is on Xbox Live with voice chat enabled. You'll soon come around to her way of thinking if those are the people you have to associate with to be called a "gamer."

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, I'm glad. If your post and actions to the comments section are representative of your normal behavior, you're doing the open source community a favor by quitting.

[personal profile] emanueleaina 2014-10-04 09:18 am (UTC)(link)
It's not like the open source community is a closed circle, you can verify yourself what's Matthew normal behaviour and his contributions.

Please, try doing some due diligence before judging if someone is deemed worth being part of open source community.
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)

Great, now we've lost another good Linux developer.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Gamers are just fucking scum.
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)
(screened comment)

Fart Fart Fart Fart

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Fart Fart Fart Fart

[identity profile] pjc50.livejournal.com 2014-10-02 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)
Best comment thread since adequacy.org.

The thing that boggles me most about the GG "campaigners" is that even if the alleged ""corruption"" wasn't mostly fictional, it would still be completely trivial. Meanwhile there's a story on Ars about the founder of EA evading $26 million in tax and I bet he's not getting many death threats.
(screened comment)

#swag

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Butthurt level: Maximum

(Anonymous) 2014-10-02 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Matthew Garrett shows us all why Theo de Raadt's motivations for creating OpenBSD were much more pure.

Page 4 of 9