Matthew Garrett ([personal profile] mjg59) wrote2014-10-02 09:20 am
Entry tags:

Actions have consequences (or: why I'm not fixing Intel's bugs any more)

Edit: About two months after this was written, Intel committed to a large scale diversity initiative. Actions speak louder than words, and this was an effective repudiation of the behaviour described below. I've happily worked on Intel-related issues since then.

A lot of the kernel work I've ended up doing has involved dealing with bugs on Intel-based systems - figuring out interactions between their hardware and firmware, reverse engineering features that they refuse to document, improving their power management support, handling platform integration stuff for their GPUs and so on. Some of this I've been paid for, but a bunch has been unpaid work in my spare time[1].

Recently, as part of the anti-women #GamerGate campaign[2], a set of awful humans convinced Intel to terminate an advertising campaign because the site hosting the campaign had dared to suggest that the sexism present throughout the gaming industry might be a problem. Despite being awful humans, it is absolutely their right to request that a company choose to spend its money in a different way. And despite it being a dreadful decision, Intel is obviously entitled to spend their money as they wish. But I'm also free to spend my unpaid spare time as I wish, and I no longer wish to spend it doing unpaid work to enable an abhorrently-behaving company to sell more hardware. I won't be working on any Intel-specific bugs. I won't be reverse engineering any Intel-based features[3]. If the backlight on your laptop with an Intel GPU doesn't work, the number of fucks I'll be giving will fail to register on even the most sensitive measuring device.

On the plus side, this is probably going to significantly reduce my gin consumption.

[1] In the spirit of full disclosure: in some cases this has resulted in me being sent laptops in order to figure stuff out, and I was not always asked to return those laptops. My current laptop was purchased by me.

[2] I appreciate that there are some people involved in this campaign who earnestly believe that they are working to improve the state of professional ethics in games media. That is a worthy goal! But you're allying yourself to a cause that disproportionately attacks women while ignoring almost every other conflict of interest in the industry. If this is what you care about, find a new way to do it - and perhaps deal with the rather more obvious cases involving giant corporations, rather than obsessing over indie developers.

For avoidance of doubt, any comments arguing this point will be replaced with the phrase "Fart fart fart".

[3] Except for the purposes of finding entertaining security bugs

Intel is inclusive

[personal profile] jkelley 2014-10-04 07:06 am (UTC)(link)
I can't really speak to the GamerGate controversy, as I haven't really followed it. However, I used to work for Intel, and it is by far the most inclusive place I have worked besides my current employer.

I believe, and I don't really know, that Intel is not supporting the side you believe, but more precisely trying to avoid any controversy. I do applaud your stance of not working unpaid any more, for you do good work and should be properly recompensed for it.

Re: Lean In(tel)

(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 10:53 pm (UTC)(link)
When one of the "sides" of the "debate" (and neither of those terms are really accurate here) has "pull the advertising" as their goal, pulling the advertising supports them. That's *why* they chose it as a goal, because they know how to make the kneejerk response from any corporation of sufficient size support them. Intel needs to be smart enough to suppress that kneejerk response in such cases, and they weren't, and now inexplicably they doubled-down on it, so... at that point, your statement sounds *awfully* close to "fart fart fart."

Intel might have great support for women who work at Intel, but this action is a big warning sign to any women who work for projects associated with Intel, or anywhere else - "we're not going to support you unless you're drawing that paycheck *direct* from us."
(screened comment)
(screened comment)

(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 03:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I love it! Not because it's the classic dumbassery you redditors put in place in order to get laid or self-gratify your ego, because it should take place with every Intel-involved FLOSS dev. And (OT taking place) this has to take place in order to fuck Wayland up.
Not because I have real criticisms to make on Wayland or a bias in favour of X.org or Mir, because I have a bias towards the Red Hatters and ex-Red Hatters imbecile, eating-everything, bloatwarophile, dictatorial point-of-view on how free operating systems have to be made. To be honest there's really nothing that wrong for the dictorial part, but the rest really brought us a shitty linux. And if you stop supporting Intel drivers, you devs kill GNOME, GTK and Wayland.
So your white knight sabotage is cool, thanks useful tool.

So let me get this straight...

(Anonymous) 2014-10-04 04:47 pm (UTC)(link)
You're protesting a company's "pandering to man-children" by... acting like a gigantic man-child.

Re: So let me get this straight...

(Anonymous) 2014-10-07 01:13 am (UTC)(link)
Irony is lost on those people, don't even try to understand them.

He did it for free, anyway. If he wants to go, well, someone better will appear. It's not like his work was stellar, anyway.
dcltdw: (Default)

[personal profile] dcltdw 2014-10-04 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Not that you know me, and certainly you don't need my approval, but: *applause* go you. :)

Blue puzzle pieces

(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 06:08 am (UTC)(link)
Even for a programmer you're autistic.

Temper, temper mon capitaine

(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 06:37 am (UTC)(link)
So because you're being an SJW and Intel isn't, Linux must now suffer. This makes perfect sense, note it in your changelogs.

ARM

(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 07:23 am (UTC)(link)
Please, join us in the ARM world. Looks like we may be getting some ACPI soon, and you seem to be a bit of a fan of device tree. Also, we have cookies.
(screened comment)

(Anonymous) 2014-10-05 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
That's admirable; it's good to know that you are prepared to take a practical step with direct real world consequences to support what you believe in.
By contrast, the hordes of anonymous moaners demonstrate both their inability to actually read your post and their outrage that anyone would actually expect them to read your post in the first place. Does it not occur to them that it makes them look exceedingly silly? I suppose if they customarily hang out in places where rape and death threats are thought to constitute rational responses to observations then they probably don't...

Stevie
(screened comment)

Re: Tell me then, Mr. mjg59, if you would

(Anonymous) - 2014-10-06 17:27 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] gnureads.wordpress.com 2014-10-05 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

Unbecoming of a supposed professional.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-06 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
As you well know, Intel only did it to distance themselves from a controversial issue, which not only means they have literal mountains more common sense than you do, it also means you're punishing them for precisely the thing you're doing right now (i.e. dropping support for a company based on a bias on a social justice issue).

And what do you think you're going to achieve other than hurting the communities you're involved in? Do you think Intel or anyone else is going to give any fucks about your little hissy fit?

This is just pathetic, you're a grown man, act with a little integrity.

Thanks.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-06 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
THanks for being a bad ass and helping to drive a wedge into the venn diagram of technology and sexism. Oh yeah, and for devoting so many brain cycles pushing forward free software!
damerell: NetHack. (normal)

[personal profile] damerell 2014-10-06 04:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Bravo.

(All else aside, I'm not convinced it is a worthy goal. As I think the Mittani put it, even if every allegation were completely true, so what? Have any of these clowns looked at mainstream journalism recently? Hell, have any of these clowns looked at the well-documented incidences of games journalism corruption, which are far more corrupt than any of their wildest dreams?)

(Anonymous) 2014-10-06 08:54 pm (UTC)(link)
As a minority I'm glad you're taking a stance on issues like these. I always enjoy your talks when I see them posted online and will continue to follow them and your blog in the future. Keep up the good fight for equality and free software!

(Anonymous) 2014-10-07 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
Intel is really shaking at the boots over your 'threat'. have fun with amd and good riddance

(Anonymous) 2014-10-08 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
*Slow clap*.
(screened comment)

Prettty surreal post, Matthew.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Recently, as part of the anti-women #GamerGate campaign[2], a set of awful humans convinced Intel to terminate an advertising campaign because the site hosting the campaign had dared to suggest that the sexism present throughout the gaming industry might be a problem.


I find this extremely difficult to believe. Intel has terminated advertising because of a suggestion that sexism might be a problem. Ummmmmmmm..... OK... kids, back away slowly now... Lisa, don't break eye contact!

I guess I'll have to go somewhere else to find out what really happened, thanks.

Kane

(Anonymous) 2014-10-13 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow. You are a joke.

If you want to put on a performance about how progressive you are, please do it somewhere that does not matter (like a Women's Studies department, perhaps).

you rock!

(Anonymous) 2014-10-20 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
GENIUS!!!

This is so stupid.

(Anonymous) 2014-10-22 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
I live in a country where women are raped, killed and even burned alive (MX), do you have idea how stupid looks all this shit?
arkady: LJing, coding, geekery (Keyboard)

[personal profile] arkady 2014-10-30 10:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you.

(also: haven't seen you in literally years; must rectify this soon so I can buy you a pint.)

Page 8 of 9